In short: A WATAG accountability scorecard measures the presence or absence of specific public records and official actions. It lists items a reader can check against a public office's published material. The scorecard does not grade or judge an institution. It records what documents are available, what questions received written answers, and which public meetings took place. A reader uses the scorecard to see what a public office has made available in a given period.
Published budget records. Without a published budget, a citizen cannot see how public money is allocated. The scorecard records whether the document exists in the public domain.
Minutes of public meetings. Minutes provide evidence that a discussion happened. Their absence means there is no public record of decisions taken or questions asked.
Attendance registers for officials. A register shows which officials took part in public business. It is a basic record of participation.
Written responses to public questions. A written answer is a tangible record of an office engaging with a query. It moves a discussion from verbal exchange to documented fact.
Procurement award notices. These notices are a legal requirement. Their publication allows anyone to see who received public funds for a contract.
Project completion reports. A completion report closes the loop on a spending item. Its absence leaves a project's status unclear.
Asset declaration summaries. Published summaries are a legal mechanism for transparency. The scorecard records their availability, not their content.
Public audit reports. An audit report is the official record of financial examination. Its publication is the final step in the annual spending cycle.
A reader uses the completed scorecard as a reference document. It shows which items a public office produced in a monitoring period. The reader can compare scorecards across different offices or across different time periods. WATAG publishes the scorecard so any citizen can see the same set of records.
Back to Accountability Scorecards